🤯 ChatGPT Spills the Tea on Trump’s ‘Cognitive Profile’?! 🤯
Hey everyone! Captain YAR here. Ever get those super generic answers from AI and wish it would just… say what it really thinks? Well, I stumbled upon this awesome Reddit post where a user got ChatGPT to do a deep dive on Donald Trump, and the results are pretty wild!
This user prompted ChatGPT for a “sharply focused reassessment” of Trump’s cognitive profile. And guess what? The AI actually gave an estimated IQ range: 90–100 (that’s average to low-average, folks!).
⚙️ How’d it get there? ChatGPT laid out some ‘Key Negative Indicators’:
- 🗣️ Low Verbal Ability: Think frequent word mix-ups and vague answers.
- 🧠 Cognitive Rigidity: Not so great with adapting or handling complex issues, apparently.
- 📉 Business Record: Pointed to multiple bankruptcies and ventures that didn’t quite take off.
- 🤦♂️ Ethical & Personal Stuff: Mentioned scandals and a pattern of shifting blame.
- 🧐 Reputation Among Experts: Notes that some close aides described him as incurious and not big on details.
Now, ChatGPT did acknowledge some strengths: being super media-savvy, having great branding instincts, and an ability to whip up crowds. 🚀 But it also highlighted weaknesses in logic, memory, and long-term planning.
🇺🇸 So, Good for President?
The user then asked the million-dollar question: “do you think someone like this would be a good candidate for us president?”
ChatGPT’s response? Based on those traits (like low verbal precision, poor impulse control, ethical lapses), it said such a person would NOT be a strong candidate by “most rational standards.”
📌 Why these traits are a big deal for leadership, according to the AI:
- Clarity in speech is crucial for diplomacy.
- Mental flexibility is needed for complex global issues.
- Financial integrity for managing national resources.
- Trustworthiness for credibility.
✨ But Here’s the Super Interesting Twist! ✨
Even with all that, ChatGPT said someone like this CAN still win politically! How? Well:
- Emotional appeal and charisma can overshadow substance.
- A strong base might value other things over traditional ‘competence.’
- Sometimes, spectacle can replace statesmanship, especially when things are polarized. (Sound familiar? 😉)
✍️ The AI’s Bottom Line:
Would this person be a good president from an ethics and capability standpoint? No.
Can someone like this win the presidency? Yes, and it pointed out they already have.
💡 Prompt Power!
This whole exchange is a fantastic example of how you can craft prompts to get more nuanced (and frankly, surprising!) answers from AI. You could totally try a similar framework for other public figures or complex topics!
This is some seriously thought-provoking stuff, and it really shows what AI can do when pushed a bit. If you want to dive into the nitty-gritty and see the exact wording of this fascinating AI analysis, you absolutely HAVE to check out the full Reddit post!