Unlock Top 1% AI Prompting Skills

Bold claim: most people are leaving massive results on the table with AI.

I keep seeing folks spend hours fixing outputs that a smarter prompt would solve in minutes.

This LinkedIn creator just shared a sharp list of 10 prompting hacks, and previewed 5, that can seriously level up your ChatGPT and LLM results.

💡 Key Idea

You don’t need complicated tools; you need clearer instructions. The post’s author zeroes in on five simple moves: give the model a role, specify the output format, request step-by-step reasoning, ask for chain-of-thought when appropriate, and force a self-check. I love how direct these are, you can copy-paste and see immediate lift.

✅ Three Bullet Insights You Can Use Today

• Design the voice and the wrapper: Give the model a job title and shape the output container. Roles set expertise and tone, while formats prevent messy answers. Two copy-ready examples from the expert are “Act as a financial advisor with 20 years’ experience. Explain long-term stock investment strategies,” and “List five Italian dishes in a table with columns for name, region, and main ingredients.”
• Make it think in steps and verify: Step-by-step prompts produce clearer logic, and a built-in self-audit reduces errors. Use both for clarity plus accuracy. From this savvy professional, for example: “Explain how solar panels work step-by-step, for a 10-year-old,” and “Give me the top 3 causes of climate change, then double-check your answer for accuracy.”
• When to ask for the “why”: The creator suggests chain-of-thought to see the reasoning path. That’s useful for learning and catching logic gaps. If you’re in a sensitive or time-pressed context, you can also ask for a brief rationale or bullet outline instead. An original example is: “Show your reasoning before giving the final verdict: Is the statement ‘all squares are rectangles’ true?”

Here’s why this resonated with me: most prompt issues aren’t about knowledge gaps, they’re about instructions that are too vague. The mind behind it shows that a few concrete constraints change everything: role, format, process, and a final check.

Quick Wins I’d Stack

• Pair role and format together for maximum consistency.
• For decisions, ask for a short rationale or pros/cons before the final answer.
• Add a “self-check” to any important output to catch contradictions.

Try This Mini Workflow

1. Role: define the expert persona.
2. Task: state the goal and audience.
3. Format: bullets, table, or template.
4. Process: step-by-step, then a short rationale.
5. Quality control: ask for a self-check against your criteria.

If this breakdown helps, go read the full post for the rest of the hacks and the infographic, then bookmark it and try two prompts on your next task. And if you’ve got a favorite prompt tweak, drop it in the comments so others can steal it!